Skip to main content

Overview

Voyager Labs Data Quality provides advanced tools for assessing and improving the quality of your CT scan data. These experimental features offer comprehensive metrics, automated quality checks, and recommendations to help you achieve optimal scan results.

What is Data Quality Assessment?

Data quality assessment in Voyager Labs includes:
  • Automated quality metrics for scan evaluation
  • AI-powered defect detection and classification
  • Comparative analysis against quality standards
  • Recommendations for scan optimization

Key Features

Quality Metrics

Noise Assessment

  • Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) analysis
  • Noise distribution mapping across the scan volume
  • Temporal noise evaluation for time-series data
  • Spatial frequency analysis

Resolution Analysis

  • Spatial resolution measurement
  • Contrast resolution assessment
  • Edge sharpness evaluation
  • Modulation transfer function (MTF) calculation

Artifact Detection

  • Beam hardening artifact identification
  • Ring artifacts detection and quantification
  • Motion artifacts assessment
  • Streak artifacts analysis

AI-Powered Analysis

Automated Quality Scoring

  • Overall quality score (0-100 scale)
  • Component-specific scores for different quality aspects
  • Comparative ranking against similar scans
  • Trend analysis over multiple scans

Defect Classification

  • Artifact type identification
  • Severity level assessment
  • Impact analysis on downstream processing
  • Remediation suggestions

Getting Started

Prerequisites

  • Access to Voyager Labs
  • Scanned data ready for analysis
  • Basic understanding of CT scan quality parameters

Running Quality Assessment

  1. Select your data in Voyager Labs
  2. Navigate to Data Quality section
  3. Choose assessment type (comprehensive, quick, or custom)
  4. Configure parameters for your specific needs
  5. Run the analysis and review results

Assessment Types

Quick Assessment

  • Basic quality metrics in under 2 minutes
  • Essential quality indicators only
  • Suitable for routine quality checks

Comprehensive Assessment

  • Full quality analysis (5-15 minutes)
  • All available metrics and AI analysis
  • Detailed recommendations and reports
  • Suitable for critical scans or research

Custom Assessment

  • User-defined parameters and thresholds
  • Specific metric selection
  • Custom quality criteria
  • Suitable for specialized applications

Understanding Results

Quality Score Interpretation

Excellent (90-100)

  • Scan meets or exceeds industry standards
  • Minimal artifacts or noise
  • Optimal for all downstream analysis

Good (70-89)

  • Scan quality is acceptable for most applications
  • Minor artifacts present but manageable
  • May require some preprocessing

Fair (50-69)

  • Scan quality is marginal
  • Noticeable artifacts or noise
  • Requires preprocessing or rescanning

Poor (0-49)

  • Scan quality is inadequate
  • Significant artifacts or noise
  • Rescanning recommended

Detailed Metrics

Noise Metrics

  • SNR values by region
  • Noise distribution maps
  • Temporal stability indicators

Resolution Metrics

  • Spatial resolution measurements
  • Contrast detail curves
  • Edge response functions

Artifact Analysis

  • Artifact location and extent
  • Severity classification
  • Impact assessment

Best Practices

Pre-Scan Optimization

  • Proper sample preparation and positioning
  • Optimal scan parameters selection
  • Environmental control (vibration, temperature)
  • Equipment calibration verification

Post-Processing

  • Artifact correction when possible
  • Noise reduction techniques
  • Resolution enhancement methods
  • Quality validation after processing

Quality Monitoring

  • Regular quality assessments for trending
  • Baseline establishment for your applications
  • Quality control procedures
  • Documentation of quality metrics

Troubleshooting

Common Quality Issues

High Noise Levels

  • Check scan parameters (exposure time, current)
  • Verify sample positioning and stability
  • Consider environmental factors
  • Review detector calibration

Poor Resolution

  • Optimize scan geometry
  • Check reconstruction parameters
  • Verify sample size and positioning
  • Review detector settings

Artifact Problems

  • Identify artifact sources
  • Adjust scan parameters
  • Improve sample preparation
  • Consider alternative scan strategies

Performance Optimization

  • Use appropriate assessment type for your needs
  • Close unnecessary applications during analysis
  • Consider data size limitations
  • Monitor system resources

Advanced Features

Batch Processing

  • Multiple scan analysis in sequence
  • Quality trend analysis over time
  • Comparative studies between scans
  • Automated reporting generation

Custom Metrics

  • User-defined quality criteria
  • Application-specific thresholds
  • Custom scoring algorithms
  • Integration with external tools

Export and Reporting

  • Detailed quality reports in PDF format
  • Metric data export for external analysis
  • Visualization exports for presentations
  • Integration with quality management systems
I